Kodarch, MagicPlan or Floorplanner: which should you choose?
All three help you produce a plan, but not for the same job. MagicPlan shines at on-site surveying (often with AR). Floorplanner is a fast 2D/3D planner, closer to real-estate or light layout use. Kodarch connects a dimensioned 2D plan, an indicative works budget and sharing with tradespeople: without 3D.
Indicative comparison based on public product positioning. Offers change: always check official sites before choosing a subscription.
Free to try · optional account to save your projects
Comparison table
Useful criteria for a renovation or layout project| Criterion | Kodarch | MagicPlan | Floorplanner |
|---|
| Main view | 2D only (top-down) | Mobile / AR survey + exports | 2D and 3D |
|---|
| Works budget | Indicative VAT-inclusive range calculator | Pro reports, not a homeowner renovation calculator | No built-in renovation cost estimate |
|---|
| Contractor / client sharing | Shareable link, often no account required to view | B2B / team workflow oriented | Sharing available, less quote-focused |
|---|
| Site survey | Express survey + materials calculator (indicative) | Historic strength (laser / camera) | Draw / import, not a laser field tool |
|---|
| Core audience | Homeowners + trades (shared bridge) | Construction pros / surveying | Agencies, fit-out, general consumers |
|---|
| Assumed out of scope | No 3D, no BIM, no signed legal quote | Little “homeowner plays with the plan” loop | Fewer technical dimensions + works budget |
|---|
Tool-by-tool summary
Kodarch
Common language of renovation: dimensioned 2D plan, indicative budget and a shareable dossier between homeowner and tradesperson.
Best if you want to frame a project (couple, family) then send a clear plan for quotes.
No 3D rendering and no AR survey as deep as MagicPlan.
MagicPlan
Historic on-site survey reference for pros, with exports and reports.
Best for a tradesperson or surveyor producing a plan quickly from site.
Less designed as a furniture / budget projection space for the end client.
Floorplanner
Fluid web tool to draw and visualise a space, with a 3D option.
Best for an agency or a fast visual presentation of a home.
Less suited if you need a works budget range and a direct bridge to tradespeople.
When to choose Kodarch?
- You are renovating and want a budget range before quotes
- You need a shared plan reference to decide as a couple
- You want to share a dossier with tradespeople without friction
- You are fine with 2D (no 3D virtual walkthrough)
When to prefer another tool?
- MagicPlan: priority on AR / laser site survey and pro reporting
- Floorplanner: priority on 3D visuals or real-estate presentation
- CAD tools (SketchUp, AutoCAD…): execution precision and heavy modelling, outside Kodarch’s positioning
- Quoting tools (Obat, Tolteck…): invoicing and trade margins. Kodarch does not replace them
Frequently asked questions
Everything you need to know before creating your plan or estimating your renovation budget.
Is Kodarch an alternative to MagicPlan?+
Partly. Both produce plans, but MagicPlan is centred on on-site surveying for pros. Kodarch is centred on homeowner ↔ trades collaboration with an indicative budget and link sharing. A tradesperson can use Kodarch to review a client plan or run an express survey, without replacing the full MagicPlan workflow.
Does Kodarch replace Floorplanner?+
No if you mainly want decorative 3D. Yes as an alternative if you need a dimensioned 2D plan + works estimate + sharing with tradespeople.
Why does Kodarch have no 3D?+
Product choice: stay simple, fast and readable for quoting. 3D slows onboarding and is not required to frame areas, dimensions and budget.
Can I try Kodarch for free?+
Yes to start a plan and an indicative estimate. An account is mainly for saving and resuming the project.
Are Kodarch amounts formal quotes?+
No. They are an indicative VAT-inclusive range to frame the project. Firm quotes remain with tradespeople.
Looking for plan + budget + sharing with tradespeople?